🔥🔥🔥 Dream Sequences In The Epic Of Gilgamesh

Wednesday, August 18, 2021 5:59:40 AM

Dream Sequences In The Epic Of Gilgamesh

Roth, under the alias Jay Gavin, had taken over for Kirby Dream Sequences In The Epic Of Gilgamesh by issue 18, and Thomas was a new talent. Created by State Trooper. Features: -Spawn hub with teleporters -Big hole in the ground for dropping stuff -An aboveground water area -A A contingent of warriors, including Odysseus hides insight Dream Sequences In The Epic Of Gilgamesh horse, while Dream Sequences In The Epic Of Gilgamesh rest of the Achaeans burn their camps Dream Sequences In The Epic Of Gilgamesh sail away from Troy, secretly waiting in The Consequences Of Secure Attachment ships behind a nearby island. Dream Sequences In The Epic Of Gilgamesh tale of the Trojan War runs from the time of Achilles's falling out with the Greek King, Lord Agamemnon, and shunning from the war to the Dream Sequences In The Epic Of Gilgamesh when Dream Sequences In The Epic Of Gilgamesh re-enters it and kills the Sigmund Freud: An Analysis Of The Psychoanalytic Theory hero, Hector, to avenge the death of his friend and companion, Patroclus. Retrieved My first map, ment to be played multiplayer.

The Epic of Gilgamesh by Sîn-lēqi-unninni - Summary \u0026 Analysis

Troy's fall from the perspective of Philoctetes is pure literary bliss. The Iliad is not. But it remains Read as part of my degree and as part of my love of classics, however it didn't compare to The Odyssey which I adored - possibly due to the lack of mythological creatures and rather more battles and lists of ships and names, which made it that much harder to struggle through.

Still a great read as one of the original classics but I would choose The Odyssey over the Iliad anytime. View all 6 comments. Feb 25, Loretta rated it it was ok Shelves: classic , myreading-challenge. This was a terribly hard read for me. I struggled to finish it, but finish it I did. View all 31 comments. Sep 23, Adina marked it as abandoned Shelves: classics , , greece , in-biblioteca , the-literature-book-pres. Last year I attended a conference where one of the speakers stated that literature starts with Homer.

I love to read so I thought that maybe I should see what the fuss is about with the cradle of the written word. I do not like poetry but I said that maybe it is time to learn how to appreciate it. Well, it didn't go well. I appreciate its worth but It was a chore to read and I had to stop after pages or so. No more epic poems for me. View all 4 comments. After reading The Illiad I faced a quandary- how do you review one of the most important and enduring works of creativity in human history? What can you say that hundreds of thousands of others haven't? My answer to this question is that I must join the chorus of those who have come before me and sing the praises of what is one of the best stories I have ever read, as fascinating and gripping now as it no doubt was when it was penned nearly three millennia ago.

There are many reasons why this book After reading The Illiad I faced a quandary- how do you review one of the most important and enduring works of creativity in human history? There are many reasons why this book has endured. It is a story of love, hate, vengeance, fate, pettiness, grief and war, bloody and prolonged war - a microcosm of human life and the furies that drive us to excess. You know the story. Paris steals Helen away to Troy.

Agamemnon and the Greeks raise and army and lay seige to that great city. Achilles, the greatest warrior history has ever seen, fights and dies, a poison arrow embedded in his ankle. The Greeks roll a massive wooden horse up to Troy's gates, and the war ends in trickery and massacre. You know all this, but trust me, you don't know it the way The Illiad tells it. This is a glorious read, the brutal blows and shrieks of war leap from the page, and the human passions that drive the protaganists are vivid and compelling.

You will read this book and wonder at how something from another time, translated from it's original tongue, can so totally enthrall a modern reader. It's powerful, heady stuff. So many images from this story are carved into my synapses. Hector and Achilles stalking the battlefield like avatars of death, scything down opponents in their tens. Priam begging Achilles for the return of his son's mangled body.

Heroes cut down mid-fight, their souls headed for the underworld, their deaths mourned even by the gods on Olympus, who watch and guide the battle from above. There are a handful of books that every reader must experience - books that are milestones in human culture. The Illiad is one of these books. I don't know how I lived more than three decades before I read it, and it makes me nostalgic for a time I never lived through, when a high school education in the classics was something that everyone received.

View all 15 comments. The original Marvel movie? What struck me most about The Iliad on this first read is that it has so much more in common with whichever blockbuster is showing at your nearest multiplex, than it does with novels as we know them today. Even the tedious parts make more sense when you view the whole thing as a movie told in words. Homer is very partial to extended similes involving lions, dogs and wild boar for some reason: As when in the midst of dogs and hunting men a wild boar or lion wheels about, reveling in his strength, and the men arraying themselves like a wall of defense stand to face him and hurl from their hands volleys of spears; but never does his noble heart feel fear, nor does he flee—and his courage will kill him— and relentlessly he wheels about testing the ranks of men, and wherever he charges, there the ranks of men give way; so Hector going along the battle throng turned and twisted All this talk of lions and boars is a little clunky on the page, and it breaks up the flow of the story.

That we humans have relied on the same methods to tell a gripping story for over 3, years is a joy to me. Our direct connection through story to the past, to people of antiquity, The Iliad and other works like it serves as a reminder that those people were more like us than we tend to recognise. Not to mention it is just a bloody good yarn. View all 13 comments. The Iliad is an ancient Greek epic poem by Homer, which presents his interpretation of the events that took place during a few weeks of the tenth and final year of the Trojan War. Homer's tale of the Trojan War runs from the time of Achilles's falling out with the Greek King, Lord Agamemnon, and shunning from the war to the time when he re-enters it and kills the Trojan hero, Hector, to avenge the death of his friend and companion, Patroclus.

After my reading of The Odyssey , I felt I need to re The Iliad is an ancient Greek epic poem by Homer, which presents his interpretation of the events that took place during a few weeks of the tenth and final year of the Trojan War. The thought that I might not have fully appreciated it kept on nagging me. I first read a prose version, but this time I resorted to the poetic translation done by Alexander Pope. And I have to confess that the result was surprising. Not only I understood it well, but I also came to fully appreciate the extent of Homer's artistry. In this new light, I'm obliged to amend my former review to express my truest thoughts on this amazing classic.

In my first read, I've misunderstood the role of Gods. I thought that they dictated and interfered unjustly in the men's war and hindered their valor. But after my reread, I now understand it was fate that governed it all, and that the Gods' role was to facilitate the course of fate. Of course, the Gods supported their chosen camp, some siding with the Greeks, who they believed to have been injured by the treachery of Paris of Troy, and others siding with the Trojans, for their faithful reverence of mighty Olympian Gods. But not any of them, not even the all-powerful Zeus could alter what the fate decreed on the mortal men.

When I understood fully the role of God, men, and fate, I was able to view the whole thing through new eyes and appreciate and enjoy the tale for its true worth. The Iliad is a tragedy. The main themes of this tragic tale are honour, loyalty, glory, and revenge. It was not the pleasantest read. Too much importance is given to the descriptions of gruesome details of war. The dramatic quality with which Homer has knitted his poem made so vivid a portrayal of battle scenes and horrific deaths that I found many passages hard to stomach. At the same time, I couldn't help admiring the ability of Homer to draw such realistic pictures through his finesse writing. And even more, I could sense the fury of men of both camps as they lunged at each other with their weapons drawn; I could hear their war cries.

I could also hear the sound of the wheels of the chariots taking the warriors to the battle, the clanging of the weapons, and the groans and moans of the dead. It was truly more than a reading experience. The narrator of the tale, while taking us through the present events, also fills in the gaps of the past and makes predictions for the future. This method of recounting the story gives a complete picture of the tale, although in the strictest sense the poem only describes a few weeks of the final year of the Trojan War.

The writing is quite descriptive. Whether it is a battle scene, weapons, the general setting, or characters both men and God , nothing has escaped Homer's minutest scrutiny. Even the pedigree of each of the characters is described! Although these details are quite overwhelming at times, they nevertheless are helpful to understand the story better.

It is amazing that how this epic poem, which is said to have written in the 7th or 8th centuries BC or BCE , has fascinated and keep on fascinating generations of readers. That in itself is proof of the true mastery of its author. When all things are considered, it is a little wonder that Homer is regarded as the pioneer of the Western Classic. A word must be said about the translation. Personally, I think it is one of the best.

As the translator himself has said, the essence of a translation is to capture the true spirit of the work which he translates without being too much burdened with the strict accuracy of the meaning. When compared the first translation I've read and my respective response with my present perception, I quite see the wisdom of Pope. It is the spirit that matters. View all 3 comments. Jun 13, Madeline rated it really liked it Shelves: poetry.

I don't know why I read this. It isn't on The List I guess because it's technically a poem, not a novel , and it wasn't assigned reading or anything. But for whatever reason, reading The Iliad has been on my mental to-do list for a while now, and last week I finally picked it up. My first reaction: dude, this epic is epic. The battle sequences are long and action-packed, everybody is Zeus's kid or nephew, the men are men and the women are decoration. It's pretty awesome, is what I'm saying. Second big reaction: I was surprised at how small the scope of this poem actually is. At the beginning, the Trojan War has already been going on for ten years, and the poem really only covers the last month or so.

It's really interesting, because the poem seems to be about how the stupid actions of a few powerful people can have far-reaching and horrible consequences. The whole driving force in The Iliad is this: Menelaus takes Achilles's favorite chick Briseis who, thanks to Movies in Fifteen Minutes , will always be known as Temple Babe in my head for his own, and Achilles throws a massive snit fit and refuses to fight in the Trojan War until the king stops raping Achilles's girlfriend and lets Achilles go back to raping her instead. Because of this, loads and loads of people die, and the gods are no help whatsoever because they're all on different sides and keep messing things up.

That's the whole story: a bunch of guys who are fighting a war because of some guy stealing somebody's girlfriend all die horrible deaths because some other guys are having a fight over somebody's girlfriend. The lesson, of course, is that women ruin everything. Normally this would be cause for me to get out my Feminist Rage Hat, except for the fact that the goddesses in this story kick so much ass I can't even get that angry about how lame Helen and Briseis are. I'm glad I took the time to read it.

View all 7 comments. Lecky Haha! Loved your review. Dan Thanks for an interesting review. I've heard that Alexander Pope translated the Iliad and Odessey in poetry and was very good. Have you read either of Thanks for an interesting review. Have you read either of those? It's definitely worth reading duh but you need to brace yourself for a slow-paced, overly detailed writing. Like all the classics. There's so much description and I found the dialogue pretty complex and long. Again like all the classics. Agamemnon is unlikable and the only reason I hate Hector is because he killed Patroclus and he was my favourite. Achilles and Patroclus were meant as a couple, I've never been more convinced. The Song of Achilles had it right. The whole thing reminded my of an Ancient Greek version of The Desperate Housewives or literally any other reality Tv show.

Also, on a side note the gods reminded me of myself whenever I play The Sims. View all 14 comments. Jun 16, James rated it liked it Shelves: 3-written-preth-century , 1-fiction. Ah The Trojan War. We all know of the horse, but how did it come together? Who was at war? And why? I still found the story fascinating and enjoyed the read. But it's a lot to digest. It's amazing when you realize these works are almost years old. Such beauty in his words. And to think about everything we've learned over the years There are some valuable lessons in this work.

If only more would give it a chance! About Me For those new to me or my reviews I write A LOT. Leave a comment and let me know what you think. Vote in the poll and ratings. Thanks for stopping by. View 1 comment. Jul 21, Settare on hiatus rated it really liked it Shelves: mythology-legends , penguin-classics-wishlist , wishlist , classics , epics , greco-roman , translated , translation-wars , classical-antiquity , poetry. I was surprised by how much I enjoyed reading The Iliad. Many parts of it are bizarre and horrifying to the modern reader, but it can certainly be enjoyed within its context.

A study guide that offers historical, cultural, and literary context to the ancient epic can significantly enhance the reading experience. I simply would not have enjoyed The Iliad if it weren't for the insight and information she offers about the historical, cultural, and literary nuances of the book. Plot Summary for the Modern Reader: On the surface, the story is pointless and simple: Achilles gets too angry and it doesn't do anyone any good. Everyone, Trojans and Greeks alike suffer the consequences of this grotesque manchild's unreasonable anger, including himself. Lots of men die in gory bloodshed.

Throw a fair amount of plotting and scheming by a bunch of ridiculous gods and a lot of misogyny in the mix and there you have it. To sum up the whole book in one phrase: toxic masculinity in full force. Themes, Differences and Similarities with our world: But. The thing is that this story, wild and distant as it sounds to our times, has striking similarities to the modern world. War, bloodlust, and misogyny have been inseparable from humankind for all of history. This book has survived millennia because it continues to resonate with generations of humans.

And it's not all bad, there are lots of amazing things about this book: beautiful poetry, gorgeous language and similes, a lot of relatable humanity throughout, touching moments, vivid characters who are relatable and nuanced, brilliant narrative that's exciting and full of suspense, and all the fun of Greek mythology. Misogyny and the Situation of Women Entering this world, I had to come to terms with the fact that Homeric society functions very differently from what I would consider agreeable. The most disturbing difference is that no one, ever, questions the validity of slavery and the inferiority of women. The whole book starts because Achilles is angry that Agamemnon took Briseis a woman, Achilles' sex slave for his own and dishonored him in doing so.

Not to mention that the war itself started just because Paris abducted Helen or they ran off together, depending on whom you ask , and Helen is usually blamed for all of it. She even calls herself "whore that I am" , more than once, while accusing herself of having started the war. Which is ridiculous, stop calling yourself a slut, Helen! This amount of sexism is infuriating, and it's precisely why I'm not rating the book 5. If I wanted to denounce every book that mistreats women, I'd have to denounce almost the entirety of literature from all cultures.

I've decided that in order to approach ancient texts, I'll accept them as they are, read them within their context and I won't let myself get enraged over every single act of misogyny. Gore and Violence: The descriptions of the book are extremely brutal. The battles are described in gory, vivid, almost cinematic detail as warriors slaughter each other by chopping each others' heads off or stabbing the weirdest body parts imaginable with "beside the nipple of the right breast" being a repeated favorite.

I confess that it is not, in any way, enjoyable to read hundreds of verses on such disgustingly gory imagery. There are long descriptions of armor and warriors putting on armor as well, which aren't that interesting, and they're almost always the same. I did not enjoy reading those parts in the slightest. Not at all. The Greek gods are so grotesque that they're almost comic. The reason why I like Greek mythology to begin with is that I can laugh at these gods and their childish actions the whole time.

They can be terrifying, but even that's somehow comic. They call each other names, they bicker, they scheme, they're vain, but they're fun to read about. Glory, Honor, Death The other cultural-historical difference that I perceive as a striking similarity is the concept of Kleos. As Vandiver explains in her lectures, Kleos is also "reputation", as in "what is said about you, by other people, especially after you die". She stresses that in the pre-literate society that Homer depicts, this concept of Kleos is the only form of immortality available to warriors and men in general.

In a society where there can be no written record of who you were and what you did, the only chance you have at being remembered and live on in the collective memories of the society is to win glory, Kleos. If you die with Kleos, people will talk about you with honor and respect, thus immortalizing you through tales and epic stories they will tell about you long after you're dead.

That is strikingly similar to the way we live today. Maybe our way of gaining a good and lasting reputation is not by raiding cities, war and manslaughter anymore, but the concept hasn't changed much: We die, we are inevitably bound to die, so we desperately try to do good, do something to live on in the collective memory of future generations after we've died. Some people can claim they don't live like that, but that's a fairly modern idea and you get my point. The warriors themselves don't even want to fight. They don't enjoy it, and they wish they could have just gone back and lived their lives in peace.

Both sides feel that way. This unwillingness and futility is stressed many times throughout the book. Agamemnon, leader of the Greeks, no fewer than three times says "we should pack up and go back to Greece, this is pointless". Most major characters at some point contemplate giving up the fight because it's just ridiculous to fight over nothing. But now a thousand shapes of death surround us, and no man can escape them, or be safe. Let us attack—whether to give some fellow glory or to win it from him. Which is very sad. If you think about this statement for a moment, you'll realize how desperate, how unfortunate, how pitiable this situation is that these warriors are stuck in.

They don't want to fight, but they can't bring themselves not do. Both sides are human. The war is pointless. That's a very realistic depiction of war, and it's a sad reality. You can't help but feel sad for all of them. I didn't like all of the characters, but I could sympathize with them and pity them in their futile attempt to immortalize their memory. This concept of mortality, the inevitability of death, the desperate urge to make a name for oneself during their short life is the main theme of The Iliad and what it has in common with human life through the centuries.

This concept, this meditation on the mortality of humans is alongside the favorite marketing tools of violent fights and sex what, I think, has kept The Iliad alive through the centuries. It's fascinating. Hating and Liking the Characters: On a less stuffy note, I want to add that a lot of characters in The Iliad are likable, even though almost all of them are misogynist vicious warriors. Patroclus is gentle and kind-hearted and he weeps for the dead the warriors and the ugliness of war. The Ajaxes there's two of them for some reason are brave and they never give up, they rush to help their fellow warriors. Odysseus, Aeneas, Priam, even Diomedes all have some deeply human moments.

Homer doesn't villainize and alienate the Trojans at all, either. They're supposed to be the enemy, but the Trojans are very human, most of them are more sensible and gentler than the Greeks. I really like the fact that they're not treated as "the savage, filthy, less-than-human enemy" at all. To me, they seemed like the actual "good people" in the whole story, especially since they're fighting to defend their city not to attack the Greeks. The hero of the Trojans and in my opinion, the hero of the whole book , crown prince Hector, is by far the most human, most relatable, most responsible, and best character among all warriors. He sounds like any normal modern man that's been forced to go to war and does so merely out of responsibility, not bloodlust.

He rushes to battle even though he most certainly would rather stay home with his wife Andromache and their infant son. On the other side, Achilles, the man who's supposed to be the hero of all heroes, is despicable. I mean that's just the way I read the story, but Achilles is horrible, insufferable, disgusting. He's impulsive, irresponsible, he has serious anger management problems!

Even though he has some profoundly human issues, I can't forgive him for what he did to Hector. As a person who takes fictional characters rather seriously, I just had to mention this. I hate Achilles. A Note on Translations: I act a bit obsessively about translations. I am never content with the one I'm reading, I always have the uneasy feeling of "what if there's a better translation out there", so I just have to check every translation I can get my hands on to see which one I like best. For reading The Iliad, I raided the library and all sources available to collect as many translations as I could and read them alongside each other for comparison.

I must give a disclaimer that I am not a translator, not a classicist, and I do not know Greek. This is by no means an expert's opinion, but merely my personal impressions based on reading and consulting four English translations alongside each other. It's beautiful, but the language isn't too outdated. It has tried to keep the poetic segmented lines format. It's very readable and I liked it much more than other translations. It also has a foreword which is informative and I enjoyed reading it. The excerpts I quoted in this review are from this translation. The language is beautiful and more heavy-handed than the rest, it attempts to keep the poetic structure as much as possible, and it's simply beautiful.

But for me, it took a bit longer to read from it because of the rather dated language. I would normally read from the Fitzgerald, mark the beautiful similes and passages and check them in the Lattimore translation afterward. The foreword, again, is very good. Rieu Translation : This one is in prose The line numbers are marked. It's readable, it's easy, and it's the most humorous one by far. I don't know if Rieu intended to make it comical, but he's phrased the bizarre dialogues in a way that came across as funny to me.

Whenever I arrived at a phrase that I found hilarious when the gods were calling each other names, for example I'd look at the Rieu translation and I wouldn't be disappointed Hera calling Zeus an arch-deceiver and Hector calling Paris Paris, you parody were two of my favorites. It also has a short plot summary with line numbers before each book chapter starts which is very useful.

The introduction is really good, too. If you want to read a prose version, this is the one for you. It has a very good and informative foreword. It's fairly readable and has attempted to keep the poetic format. I don't have anything against it, but it just doesn't stand out compared to Fitzgerald or Lattimore. I read the first two books from it and then I gave it up, occasionally consulting it on interesting sections. You can choose whichever translation you like. If you're more comfortable with prose, go with Rieu. If you like the "poetic" format, I'd say try Fitzgerald.

It is worth mentioning that none of the "poetic" translations are actual poems in English. Translation inevitably sacrifices the true poetic quality of the original. None of these translations have a noticeable rhyme and rhythm, let alone a standard meter. But that's just something we have to accept whenever reading something in translation. Whichever edition you choose is fine, they're all by experienced scholars. But please read the introduction because they are all very well-written, informative, and insightful.

I've been rambling long enough. I just want to conclude by saying that The Iliad is well worth reading. It's interesting and exciting and bizarre and stupid and beautiful all at the same time, and I definitely enjoyed it and learned a lot from it. View all 19 comments. Foolish me. I thought I was going to look at the different editions of The Iliad and choose the one most readable but did not reckon with the overwhelming beauty of the language and story.

The truth is, it does not matter which edition you choose, so long as you read at least one. It is inevitable that you will find yourself drawn to the question of the most beautiful and complete rendition but you may wisely concede defeat at the beauty of each. The Homeric epics are said to be the greatest s Foolish me. The Homeric epics are said to be the greatest stories, martial stories, ever sung or written of all time , so if for some reason they did not resonate for you in high school, you may want to revisit what your teachers were talking about.

When they describe the death of a man in the full bloom of his strength looking like an flower in a rainstorm, head and neck aslant, unable to withstand the beating rain, we understand. It is argued by some, including British scholar M. West, that The Iliad has had pieces added to it over the years. It is also the shortest. Mitchell also shortens the lines in English so that they have speed and momentum for an impressive delivery. The recent Peter Green translation, begun when Green was nearly 90 years old, is similarly easy to read; Green tells us that he began in a relaxed attitude for diversion and completed the whole within a year.

Neither the writing or the reading of this version is anguished or tortured, and Burrow points out that Green was a historian but didn't allow that to obfuscate or weigh down the poetry. And later, as the blow-by-blow of the battle proceeded, one imagines each region cheering when mention of their leader is declaimed, though some died horrible deaths. This is another reason to read this ancient work: We live and die not unlike one another, we who lived so far apart in time, and perhaps the ardor young men of today have for the sword and for fame will be doused by the utterly desolate manner of death recounted here, one in particular that I cannot forget: a spear through the buttock and into the bladder meant a painful and ugly death. Caroline Alexander, after a lifetime of her own research into the Homeric epics argues in The War That Killed Achilles: The True Story of Homer's Iliad and the Trojan War that the work certainly required days to recite, and may have been performed in episodes.

The length of the piece suggests the piece was once short enough to be memorized, leaving room for invention and modification as befits the oral tradition. I wonder now which European language has the most translations, and do they sometimes dare to attempt translations from ancient Greek to, say, French, and then to English? It seems we have enough scholars understanding ancient Greek to give us satisfactory versions without resorting to piggybacked translations.

An attempt was made by John Farrell in the Oct 30, edition of the Los Angeles Review of Books to untangle the English translations and sort them for clarity and poetry. Those of us who love this work will read them all, especially the fascinating introductions to each in which the scholars themselves wax eloquent about what they loved about it. Mitchell's introduction is especially accessible and impelling: I could hardly wait to get to the story.

Daniel Mendelsohn "graded" four translations in the article discussing Mitchell's translation. In the end, whichever edition gives you the greatest access for your first attempt to breach the ramparts of this ancient work is the one to choose for a first read. The other editions will naturally come later, once you have the sense of the story, a few names nailed down, and have that deepening curiosity about the poetry and the beauty.

One last observation is that the men in this epic were mere playthings of the gods, gods that could be cruel, petty, jealous, and vengeful. There was striving among men, but most of the time human successes or failures had less to do with who they were than with who they knew. Was it ever thus. View all 24 comments. The story of the siege of Troy is one of heroism and tragedy. There are so many unforgettable characters here - both gods and heroes - that it is like watching an old black and white movie with those incredible crowds like in Ben Hur.

You can see the vast encampment of Greeks around Troy, you can smell the cooking fires and hear the laughter in the camp - the jeers at the wall and the frustration on both sides as the siege goes on and on. The epic battles near the end the claim the lives of some The story of the siege of Troy is one of heroism and tragedy. The epic battles near the end the claim the lives of some of mythologies greatest heroes - Achilles and Hector - are beyond description. The Rouse translation is a bit dry but still does a great job of bringing this classic tale to life.

I would love to hear from commenters on alternate translations, but this one which is a bit of a classic is the only one I have tried. May 23, Sue rated it it was amazing Shelves: plan-to-re-read , classics , re-read , read-in-college , my-own-books. I have now read The Iliad for the first time since my college days. I almost wonder if I actually read the whole book back then. It seems so different now, so much more all-encompassing, universal and timeless in dealing with men at war, issues of honor, duties of leadership, fate, individuals and community.

Certainly the gods seem more petty and childlike than I remembered. On this reading it is both more brutal and more beautiful than I expected; in that way I would guess it mirrors life. It a I have now read The Iliad for the first time since my college days. I was also struck by the human-seeming nature of the gods. They had more power and immortality, but they were petty and, at times mean and spiteful. There also played games with human lives and destinies. Though they perhaps brought a vague order to human's lives, there was no nobility to their existence.

I likely will read The Iliad again before long I already have a kindle copy of Catherine Alexander's translation for comparison. I enjoyed Fagles' translation very much and found his descriptive writing often beautiful, his war and battle scenes brutally clear. All in all, I'm very glad I have finally returned to Homer's world. Lattimore many years ago.

I very much enjoyed Fagles' Odyssey and look forward to trying a new version of The Iliad as a more "mature" adult. View all 10 comments. My very best experience with the Iliad. In fact, one of my best audio book experiences. I highly recommend this version translated by Robert Fagles and narrated by Derek Jacobi. The Iliad was originally recited, performed orally for an audience rather than being read individually. Homer, man or group, is credited with writing it down, but it continued to be recited. I find that this is still the way to enjoy it. From the Publisher This set, translated by Robert Fagles, includes an abridged Iliad on six audio cassettes nine hours accompanied by a nine page booklet.

The text is read by Derek Jacobi. Mar 07, Trevor I no longer get notified of comments rated it it was amazing Shelves: literature , history. I read the Odyssey at Uni and really loved it. A romp off to parts unknown with a man who is good company from a distance. As with much of fiction, the people I am delighted to spend lots of time with on the page are not necessarily those I would want to spend anytime with otherwise. I mean, this Homer guy only wrote two books and I had enjoyed the other one, so … so, a mere twenty years later how time flies I got around to reading this one.

The p I read the Odyssey at Uni and really loved it. The problem was that I knew exactly what this one was about. Not much point reading this one if you already know the whole damn story. Now, you might be thinking — this guy should have put a spoiler alert at the start of this. The idea Homer could be allowed to get away with writing a book about something everyone knows it is about and not actually writing about any of these things is, to say the least, rather frustrating. It might just be me, but I would have thought that if you are going to write the FIRST epic in the Western Literary Tradition it does seem somewhat presumptuous to assume people know the back story.

Instead, this book starts a mere 9 years after the war had began. There is precious little by way of explaining how we got here. And it ends the day before the final battle for Troy and before anyone seems to have come up with the idea of a wooden horse with a hollow middle. Spoilers start more or less now — if you are worried. Also a bit like the Godfather films in which they seem to have decided not to kill any two major characters in exactly the same way.

Bronze swords knocking out teeth before plunging through skull with attendant buckets of blood and spraying brain matter plays, be well assured, a large part in this book. In fact, by close to the end I was thinking I had had more than enough and was looking forward to the whole thing being over. And then that totally unexpected end! Jesus, what a way to finish a book. I was blown away. Achilles does not really come out of this book looking too good. I know he is meant to be a bit of a hero the only things I knew about him before this being he had been dipped in a river as a child to protect him from harm and held by the ankles, so therefore these were his only venerable parts — and of course, none of this is actually mentioned here, though I suspect you are meant to already know.

The whole book revolves around Achilles being annoyed at having his girlfriend taken from him and him spending most of the time in a petulant rage about to go home, stuck in one of his ships while all hell is breaking lose around him. Nothing they like better than getting involved in human affairs and causing infinitely more trouble than they are worth. It is as if the West Moorabbin Under Twelves are being put up against Manchester United all stars team and the dads of the under twelves are turning up to support their kids. Both sides foresee what is to happen to the women of Troy once the battle is over, for example, and this is none-too-pretty. All the same, after book after book of this I was well over these endless descriptions. But then book Hector has been killed.

Achilles killed him to revenge the death of his friend Patroclus, who Hector had killed and tried to quarter and feed to the dogs. I had never really thought about the significance of bodies after they have died in war — but psychologically, knowing or worse, as in this case, not knowing, but assuming what the enemy are doing to the dead body of your child, is, without question, unspeakably horrible. Like I said, a remarkably moving end to the poem. As always, I was much too timid in my definition. If they are particularly good classics, they are also not about what you think they were about while you were reading them either. This is an excellent case in point.

This is a story of battles. It begins with a battle of principles between Achilles and Agamemnon, and as stubborn as they both are, I could sympathize with both views. I enjoyed that. I appreciated the depiction of the gods and goddesses. They were a dysfunctional family, deeply flawed, and yet human lives were subject to their whims. It made for an integrated unfolding of free will and fate. I coul This is a story of battles. I could also see clearly how classic story structure was built in this poem, each action causing a reaction that created an inevitable outcome or conclusion. I appreciated how neither the Trojans nor the Greeks were depicted as evil or wrong each had their reasons , and in the end I grieved their losses equally. And most pages describe battle after battle, death after death, without giving the reader enough of character to care.

The description of the woundings felt like they were written with the glee and remove of children in a school yard - lots of heads popping off bodies, and eyes popping from heads, which made them kind of fun. I imagine those who listened to these stories back then had prior knowledge of the personalities, and so were invested in their origins and fates. I probably should have done more research. In the end, the story felt too impersonal to me, unlike The Odyssey, which I enjoyed. They lived in a house where a narrow enfilade made up for a pitch to make up for an amateurish game of cricket with one opening to the hall room and the other two to a bedroom and kitchen facing opposite to each other.

The challenge of a re-game to settle the dust on who is the better player would finally lead to a recollection of They lived in a house where a narrow enfilade made up for a pitch to make up for an amateurish game of cricket with one opening to the hall room and the other two to a bedroom and kitchen facing opposite to each other. The challenge of a re-game to settle the dust on who is the better player would finally lead to a recollection of past games which were remembered distinctly by the two challengers in a way that favored them. The younger brother readily accepted the challenge of a replay of the previous final to settle the mad confusion of pride.

In a series of events rife with verbal intimidation and disagreements they reached up to the last ball of the final over where the younger brother had to take up a run to win the game. The bowler weighed his options and decided to propel the final ball to the weak-spot of the batsman, a well-known weakness although taking the risk of the batsman correctly anticipating it. The ball was bowled out of the reach of the batsman with its first bounce onto the floor which would in its further movement move inwards leaving the batsman with no option other than to send the ball into the hallway and in order to completely execute the shot the batsman had to shift to his weaker leg leaving him in an awkward position which made it a difficult shot to play.

As feared by the bowler, the ball was anticipated correctly and was successfully sent into the hallway and the batsmen hurtled towards the opposite end to get the single run and win the game. Little did he realize the ball dragged across the complete diagonal of the hall and reached for the showcase containing the statue of the famed discus thrower. The statue was bought from Italy by a young man with the same smile the boy had when he reached the crease and made the winning run.

He launched a frenzied run towards the showcase. It had held him in a peculiar state of rapture every time he glanced at the statue. That is the exact point of commencement of a passion the younger brother still pursues to this date. The passion sill goes strong. Have you ever been deeply conscious of a passion you pursue so as to precisely depict the impingement of an ongoing rush of adrenaline hitting you every time you think of it? The tragedy, the unending conquest of humans as well as the Gods to extend their hands and rapaciously grab onto something higher than self ultimately leading to their downfall. The realization of hubris and the rationale behind it and yet repeating our mistakes seem to be a common theme yet the circumstances and the reasoning behind it always make the stories worth the read.

This conspicuous theme with a backdrop of bloody violence and unfair dealings to the mortals leaves with the same expression and the same learnings which could be possibly abstracted from other pieces of Greek literature but it still connects me to the human side of events guided by force. Interesting thing about force is the way a human being would perceive it. It might just be the different emotions depicted as Gods. Or simply an ephemeral piece of conscious driving motives in the characters.

I apologize for the disjointed review though and would gladly agree that my bias towards Greek mythology drove me to give this book a 5 star rating. But you already know the complete story. View all 11 comments. I read the Iliad. And well, I suppose it what I was expected. However, after reading The Song of Achilles , which I loved not too long ago, I thought I would pick this up again, now that the context is much clearer. Now, while I am reading a translated version of the text as unfortunately, I am not familiar with Ancient Greek, it is interesting to still look at some of the way this is worded.

I found it oddly amusing that there was generally always some sort of description whenever a name of a character was mentioned. Instead of just saying Achilles, it was always something like, the son of Peleus, Achilles, or godlike Achilles. While it was almost funny at first seeing all the characters being introduced like this, it did start to get incredibly repetitive and annoying and in terms of modern writing, it is so unnecessary to provide an, albeit short description every time no matter how minor a character pops up.

This book, which is set during the last few stages of the Trojan War features a lot of battle sequences and as a huge reader of modern fantasy, the way that action is written as changed drastically. Here, everything just sort of casually moves along and some elements are described in excruciating detail. Maybe this is a genius piece of art and I simply cannot fathom at how brilliant it is. I find it fascinating at how people, just over time, find it difficult to tell the difference between myth and truth and at how it is almost easier to accept that gods walked amongst us once and at how the truth happens to be bent when stories are passed down orally.

I perfectly understand at how important this story is in western literature, yet, as I found it to be overly slow and slightly repetitive, that from a modern standpoint, it failed to wow me. I get the value of this, yet if someone was to write like this now, where there is no character development, where the book is very repetitive and where the plot trudges very slowly along, it would be nowhere near as popular. A part of why this is still such a famous text is undoubtedly the fact that it was written so long ago. I mean sure. View all 8 comments. Readers also enjoyed. Videos About This Book. More videos About Homer. These epics lie at the beginning of the Western canon of literature, and have had an enormous influence on the history of literature. When he lived is unknown.

Watch it if you love: The Walking Dead ; Lucifer. Its production pedigree and glib roasting of materialism through the magic-using preppy Kaz set it apart from the majority of animated and live-action series alike. For such a deceptively simple concept, each episode of Aggretsuko touches on the challenges that urbanite young people deal with in the s, be they dating troubles, finding genuine friendship, or knowing when to assert yourself at work.

Its wry comedy, simplified art style, and dramatic soundtrack all make it compulsively bingeable. Watch it if you love: The Office ; Metalocalypse. Puella Magi Madoka Magica was written and produced by master anime deconstructivist Gen Urobuchi with the express intention of upending your expectations. Watch it if you love: The Matrix ; the Game of Thrones approach to character death. They also love eating cell phones and look adorably cuddle-worthy. The flight sequences typically feature intricate, fully animated jet-to-dragon transformations, and the scale and speed that the artists manage to convey in each episode is intoxicating.

Their job: to serve Death by claiming the souls of 99 evil humans and one witch before graduating to the next level. Soul Eater is a tonal playground of Hot Topic references, macabre color schemes and background designs, and characters who relish in roasting each other. Like any moody kid, all the eponymous Saiki wants is to be left alone and mind his own business, but the need to keep his secret from most of the people around him gets in his way. His deadpan delivery and ever-present internal monologue drive the show, and each episode delivers a new, deliciously meta comedy of errors.

Watch it if you love: Scooby-Doo ; Sesame Street. Look out for daddy issues and formal experimentation galore in this classic, which Netflix made available in the U. Code Geass has sci-fi combat, bureaucratic backstabbing, teen comedy, and a future in which imperialism and caste systems keep the populace underfoot. Watch it if you love: Lost ; The Road. One Punch Man shows us Saitama trying to answer that question through the eyes of his cyborg mentee, Genos, along with earth-shattering fight scenes and the machinations of an organization of ranked heroes that Saitama and Genos try to break into.

Watch it if you love: Ip Man ; Thor: Ragnarok. Naruto and his friends work together as a team of ninjas, doing everything from taking odd jobs to taking out enemies. The show revolves around year-old shogi player Rei and how he copes with the loss of his family. It can feel more like a tone poem than TV — far from a bad thing. When in doubt, let your characters duke it out. Note that there are two adaptations of this series, and Netflix has the later, one — largely considered the superior run. Watch it if you love: Guardians of the Galaxy, Vol. The historic and the supernatural collide in this epic anime about a high-school girl, Kagome, who is flung hundreds of years into the past only to meet a half-demon, Inuyasha.

Along the way, they accrue a merry band of friends who join them in their quest to find the shards and slay the demons that get in their way. At episodes, Inuyasha is a lengthy saga but one driven by slow-burning character plotting and the slaying of grim beasts. Watch it if you love: Outlander ; Xena: Warrior Princess. Alexander the Great, Gilgamesh, King Arthur, and other historical and mythological figures talk smack at each other before violently clashing in this circuitous history of a secret war for the Holy Grail.

The girls in the club need recruits to prevent the school from disbanding it, and as they staff up, they make friends, drink tea, play lively J-pop, and deal with the existential pressures of high school. Watch it if you love: School of Rock ; Glee. There are very few notable, let alone great , volleyball movies or TV shows, so by scarcity alone, Haikyu!! While the premise sounds like an after-school special, the animation from Production I. For those who deal with trauma, daily interactions can often feel the hardest to overcome. Clannad seems to understand that, revolving around a boy named Tomoya whose mother died at an early age and whose home life with his father is a series of tacit surrenders to inertia.

Along the way, he helps solve their various problems too. Clannad may be slow-paced, but its emotional payoffs are entirely worth it. The creator of legendary anime series Cowboy Bebop brought this show, which is set on a futuristic Mars, has pop songs as the episode titles, and features financial desperation as the animating concern of his protagonists. Watch it if you love: Empire Records ; Josie and the Pussycats. Practically every entry in the long-running Gundam maxiseries is about the human cost of using child soldiers in combat, but Iron-Blooded Orphans makes its metaphors much more explicit. When they happen upon a powerful weapon the titular Gundam , they rise up against their masters and go into business for themselves.

Iron-Blooded Orphans pulls no punches, down to the creepy blood-squelching sound effects used when the young soldiers jack in, Matrix -style, to their mecha. The anime classic, based on the manga by Masami Kurumada and alternately known as Knights of the Zodiac , follows the battles of five warriors who wield magic armor linked to the constellations. They fight valiantly for the Greek goddess Athena and look badass while doing it. Watch it if you love: Wonder Woman ; Clash of the Titans. Watch it if you love: Rainy days; Columbus. Kaiju are nothing if not a metaphor for the turbulent messiness of childhood, and Dino Girl Gauko makes that clear through its protagonist Naoko, who turns into a fire-breathing dinosaur girl when her rage boils over.

This is emphatically a kids show, but the super-simplified 2D animation, silly concept, and short runtime nine-minute episodes! This is the latest work by Akira Shigino, a director with a long career in goofier, child-oriented fare just like this. Created by LeSean Thomas, it follows the misadventures of the outlaw Philly the Kid as he dodges bounty hunters, cracks wise, and leads his companions to the location of a prince.

Watch it if you love: Firefly ; The Boondocks. Part high-school melodrama, part slow-burn horror, and part unabashed furry fantasy, Beastars is terrific. Watch it if you love: Zootopia ; Cruel Intentions. This is the rare anime with episodes that double as lessons in human physiology. One Piece follows the journey of Monkey D. Watch it if you love: Pirates of the Caribbean ; Black Sails. Speedwagon and the herculean musculature of its character designs.

Watch it if you love: Bloodsport ; Mortal Kombat. Few shows can depict the wonder of open sky quite like Drifting Dragons does. The visuals are a delight in Drifting Dragons , which is awash with color and vibrant dragon designs that look more like the angels seen in Neon Genesis Evangelion than the dragons you might see on Game of Thrones. Just about every episode presents a fun dragon meat recipe, which helps flesh out the world. Watch it if you love: Moby Dick ; TaleSpin. The show is more or less an elementary-school take on Sailor Moon , focused on the fourth-grader Sakura and her quest to retrieve a set of magical cards that she released into the world.

Food Wars! An acquired taste, yes, but rich nonetheless. Watch it if you love: Top Chef ; Samurai Gourmet. The alien invasion is coming, but the one that tried to take over your mind and body fudged it. Parasyte is what happens when a human, Shinichi, and an alien worm, Migi, decide to work together to save themselves and the Earth. Watch it if you love: The Yeerks in Animorphs ; Venom. This Chinese martial-arts action anime is unlike any on this list. Its hero is a wannabe professional assassin who screws up his assignment. His recourse: go undercover as a hairdresser in a salon.

Dream Sequences In The Epic Of Gilgamesh road there, however, came Dream Sequences In The Epic Of Gilgamesh an infamously protracted Troubled Production. Yes, Dream Sequences In The Epic Of Gilgamesh Disadvantages Of Library Research true. That Came Out Wrong : The heroes like Dream Sequences In The Epic Of Gilgamesh tease each other about accidental innuendos: One possible exchange you can overhear in the car is this: Prompto : Ah, sweet chocobos, you always set my mind at ease. The Stinger : Episode Duscae has what kafka metamorphosis meaning perhaps the single cruelest stinger Square-Enix has ever produced. Prophunt wont work because

Web hosting by Somee.com